Achmed the Dead Terrorist....

[derricksonb]

Well, not yet at least.....

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/02/11/911.charges/index.html

[Chutney Daftcraft]

Achmed?

You are such a racist.

[Starbuck]

I'm confused, cause not one of the potential Defendants is named Achmed.

Gee, I wonder what the response would be if I started a thread called.

Billy-Bob the Dead Redneck

[Chutney Daftcraft]

Billy-Bob

EXCUSE ME! It's William Robert to YOU.

[grafxgirl]

The comedian Jeff Dunham has an act with Achmed.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jA_ABcohuZ8

[STR1KER]

OMG Kdawg and I SOOOOO LOVE Jeff Dunham!

[ValentineJessi]

me too, he's soooo frickin hooo-larious!

[STR1KER]

"SILENCE!!!! I KEEEEEL YOUU!" hahahaha

[PhoenixOrion]

Dude is funny.

[derricksonb]

Dude is funny.

Indeed.

But I'm glad to see that they are finally ready to charge those who alledgedly plotted to commit acts against the United States and its citizens.... Too bad we're a nation of pansies and will probably end up allowing them to rot in a jail cell rather than actually carry out the executions **should** they be convicted.

[PhoenixOrion]

lol Sorry, I didn't read the article. Short attention span, ya know.

[ValentineJessi]

Me either Pheonix, I just saw Achmed, and knew it would be something funny lol.

[June]

Me either Pheonix, I just saw Achmed, and knew it would be something funny lol.

Oops...sorry! Thought I clicked on "humor" forum!

[cindylu]

Funnnnneeeee!!

I miss cable t.v.!! Glad YouTube is around.

[derricksonb]

And that's why it's impossible to have an intelligent discussion with women. 13 responses from 8 different women and not a single one related to the content of the article.

[Chutney Daftcraft]

And that's why it's impossible to have an intelligent discussion with women. 13 responses from 8 different women and not a single one related to the content of the article.

While you're up there on that throne, could you please tell us peasants what the topic's title has to do with the article, and it's contents?

Thanks!

[derricksonb]

While you're up there on that throne, could you please tell us peasants what the topic's title has to do with the article, and it's contents?

Thanks!

Well, if you must know it was a cultural reference that should have enticed the user to read the article. One which pertained to something you and the rest of the Liberal Lefty Terrorist Loving Hippie Morons have been demanding for years. Charge those detained at Gitmo with a crime or release them..... So we did. And it just so happens that those charges are punishable by the death penalty... hence the dead terrorist reference.

[Chutney Daftcraft]

But not a one of them is named achmed, and not a one of them is dead, at least yet. Therefore, the subject and the article do not align in any way.

Don't go blaming the lack of topic consistency as the reason why it's impossible to have a discussion with women. Everyone knows it's impossible to do because women just run amuck with things like logic, and common sense. Can't have a lively debate with those qualities, now can we?

[grafxgirl]

I read the article, had nothing to add to it, someone asked a question about the title of thread, I answered it and I was done.

[derricksonb]

But not a one of them is named achmed...

That's the cultural icon referenced....

Can't have a lively debate with those qualities, now can we?

Sure. Take it to general chat or entertainment where jackassery is King, but this is a current events / politics discussion forum.

Any thoughts about trying them in a military court vs civilian? I thought for sure that one of you would have been all over that little fact...